Chicago weighs legalising video gambling at airport and bars
Chicago is currently evaluating two new ordinances that could pave the way for the installation of hundreds of video gambling terminals at O’Hare and Midway airports, as well as in bars, restaurants, and other establishments across the city. However, the proposals face opposition from Mayor Brandon Johnson’s financial team, which has voiced concerns about the potential risks and long-term implications of expanding access to gambling.
Video gambling in Illinois
Since video gambling was legalised in Illinois in 2009, numerous towns have embraced the activity and reaped substantial financial benefits. Chicago, however, opted out due to concerns about its reputation, potential increases in violence, and the risk of gambling addiction.
With the recent opening of a 바카라 in the downtown area, several officials have expressed apprehension that further gambling expansion could cannibalise revenue. Nonetheless, mounting financial pressures have prompted the city to reconsider its stance.
Overview of proposed ordinances
Alderman Gilbert Villegas has introduced an ordinance that would permit video gambling terminals at O’Hare and Midway airports. The proposal includes a $10,000 licence fee per location, a $500 fee per terminal, an additional $1,000 terminal licence, and a further $500 fee per unit. Villegas estimates that 400 machines generating $800 per day could yield approximately $116.8 million in annual revenue.
Villegas stated, “The General Assembly has provided this opportunity through the 바카라 bill. Yet we’re not taking advantage of capturing revenue from one of the busiest airports in the country. Travellers often spend one or two hours waiting. If their flight is delayed or they’re making a connection, there’s an opportunity to engage an audience that may not even be visiting the city.”
Separately, Alderman Anthony Beale has proposed a citywide ordinance that would allow video gambling terminals in bars, restaurants, and other local venues. His proposal includes a $500 licence fee per location and a $1,000 fee per terminal. Beale argues that the city must explore alternative revenue sources to ease the financial burden on residents.
Beale commented, “We need to implement this citywide and at the airports. We need the revenue, and this administration has not demonstrated a willingness to find new sources that won’t impact taxpayers in every household. I’m hoping these ordinances will finally prompt action.”
Sweepstakes machines and enforcement priorities
Sweepstakes machines, often disguised as devices selling phone cards or internet time—have been identified as unregulated gambling units. Alderman William Hall, chair of the revenue subcommittee, has called for their removal prior to any expansion of legal video gambling. He estimates that the city could support over 3,800 regulated terminals once illegal machines are addressed.
Hall remarked, “Sweepstakes machines are essentially illegal slot machines in many neighbourhoods. They’re fuelling a black market that’s harmful to our communities.”
Revenue estimates and financial concerns
Villegas projects that airport-based terminals could generate up to $116.8 million annually. However, Chicago’s Chief Financial Officer, Jill Jaworski, remains sceptical. Citing a consultant’s analysis, she estimates potential revenue at closer to $10 million per year. Jaworski also warned that video gambling could divert income from the city’s downtown 바카라, which is subject to significantly higher tax rates.
The proposals have sparked division among city council members and the public. Supporters argue that expanded gambling would generate new revenue and support local businesses. Opponents raise concerns about community impact, gambling addiction, and competition with the existing 바카라. The ordinances are scheduled for review next week by the committee chaired by Alderman Hall.
Comparison with Other U.S. Cities
Cities such as Las Vegas, Atlantic City, and St. Louis have implemented video gambling with mixed outcomes. While some have experienced increased revenue, others have reported adverse social effects. Airport gambling has also produced varied results, depending on local regulations and enforcement.
